Abstract
The relative performances of two optimization algorithms – dual active-set method (DASM) and primal-dual interior-point method (PDIPM) in the implementation of model predictive control (MPC) in terms of input response, CPU time, and number of iteration have been compared with the help of three case studies including MPC of continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) in series. The study shows significant improvement of convergence, CPU time, and cost per iteration using DASM for small-scale problem. Both DASM and PDIPM have been observed to be efficient, as the number of iterations is found to be independent of the problem size. Our study also shows that DASM gives better performance over PDIPM.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
