Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of two typical inverse algorithms, i.e., direct and iterative inversion methods, to reconstruct the shear modulus distribution of linearly elastic solids. Both approaches are based on the finite element framework and compared utilizing both the simulated and experimental data. The reconstruction results demonstrate that both approaches are capable of identifying the nonhomogeneous shear modulus distribution of solids well. It can also be found that the direct inversion method is much faster than the iterative inversion method, whereas the iterative inversion method is capable of yielding better shear modulus ratio between the stiff inclusion and the soft background even with very high noise levels. Afterwards, a thorough comparison on the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches has been performed. This comparative study provides useful information on the selection of the proper inverse scheme in estimating nonhomogeneous elastic property distribution of soft solids nondestructively.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call