Abstract

Abstract: Cloud computing is now ubiquitous and provides convenient access to computing resources on demand. Cloud environments are complex and prone to faults, which can have a negative impact on service quality. Cloud providers must be able to detect issues in a proactive manner using unsupervised anomaly detection. This does not require labeled data. This paper presents a comparison of deep neural networks and support vector machine (SVMs), both used for unsupervised anomaly identification in cloud environments. On benchmark datasets provided by cloud providers, we evaluate the performance Autoencoders with LSTM models, One Class SVMs, and Isolation Forests. Our results show that shallow Autoencoders do not capture workload patterns well, but LSTMs or Convolutional Autoencoders can. SVMs are as good or better than Autoencoders. One-Class SVMs show robust performance in all workloads. Isolation Forests perform poorly on cloud data that is seasonal. One-Class SVMs are the most accurate and low latency option for anomaly detection. Our findings offer cloud providers guidance on how to select suitable unsupervised models based upon their performance, interpretability, and computational overhead. The results and comparative methodology will be used to inform future research into adapting unsupervised-learning for cloud anomaly detection.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.