A Comparative Study of Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Sub-harmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE) in a Bladder Phantom

Abstract

ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of different commercial ultrasound contrast microbubbles (MBs) when measuring bladder phantom pressure with sub-harmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) methodology. We hypothesized that SHAPE performance is dependent on MB formulation. This study aimed to advance the SHAPE application for bladder pressure measurements in humans. MethodsUsing a previously designed and built bladder phantom, we tested four different commercial agents: Definity, Lumason, Sonazoid and Optison. A standard clinical cystometrogram (CMG) system was used to infuse a MB–saline mixture into the bladder phantom to measure pressure. Ultrasound imaging was performed using the GE Healthcare LOGIQ E10 scanner. ResultsAll agents showed a predicted inverse linear relationship between change in pressure and SHAPE signal. However, they differ from each other in terms of stability, linear correlation, sensitivity to pressure and error. Generally, Definity and Lumason showed the highest performance during the SHAPE-based bladder phantom pressure assessments. ConclusionOur results show that the SHAPE signal decreases as bladder phantom pressures increases, regardless of the agent or CMG phase, suggesting the possibility of using SHAPE for measuring bladder pressure without a catheter. However, the efficacy of SHAPE in measuring pressure varies by MB formulation. These observations support using Lumason and Definity in a human subject feasibility study as we advance toward a catheter-free solution for measuring voiding bladder pressure via SHAPE.