A Comparative Study of Cavitary and Noncavitary Non–small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with CT-Guided Microwave Ablation

Abstract

PurposeTo explore the outcomes of computed tomography‒guided microwave (MW) ablation in patients with cavitary non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to compare the outcomes of cavitary and noncavitary NSCLC treated with MW ablation. Materials and MethodsA total of 317 patients with NSCLC (194 men and 123 women) treated with MW ablation were include: 19 patients with cavitary NSCLC and 298 patients with noncavitary NSCLC. Complications, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to investigate the correlation of cavity and OS in patients with NSCLC. ResultsA total of 364 MW ablation procedures were performed. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histopathological subtype in patients with cavitary NSCLC (73.7%). Cavitary NSCLC had an incidence rate of 57.9% in overall complications, which was significantly higher than that of 34.6% for noncavitary NSCLC (P = .040). In a mean follow-up of 27.2 months ± 11.9, the median PFS and OS for cavitary NSCLC were 9.0 months ± 8.5 and 14.0 months ± 10.8, respectively, and those for noncavitary NSCLC were 13.0 months ± 10.7 and 17.0 months ± 10.9, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (P = .180) or OS (P = .133) between cavitary and noncavitary NSCLC. In addition, the local recurrence rates for cavitary and noncavitary NSCLC were 15.8% and 21.5%, respectively, and no significant difference was found (P = .765). The Kaplan-Meier method revealed no association between the cavity and OS in patients with NSCLC treated with MW ablation. ConclusionsMW ablation was an effective and safe approach for cavitary NSCLC treatment. Compared with noncavitary NSCLC, cavitary NSCLC manifested with more complications but a comparable outcome after MW ablation.