Abstract
This is a comparative study of agricultural support institutions in Central Province, Zambia focusing on the 1980-90 and 1997-2008 periods. Generally, the study intended to identify the names of agricultural support institutions which existed in Central Province, as a smaller unit, and Zambia in general, and analyze their spatial aspect. In order to achieve this and other goals, the investigation conducted an extensive review of existing literature, old and new maps, distribution of questionnaires to informants, interviews, Focus Group Discussions and observations. The main thesis of this study was that agricultural support institutions differed in nature, funding, control and spatiality over different periods in Zambia’s history. The major findings were that both private and government agricultural support institutions existed soon after independence up to 1973 when the Zambian government declared a one party system and thereby nationalizing over 90% of the agricultural industry. Thus, the majority of agricultural support institutions between 1973 and 1990 were government funded, owned and controlled parastatal organizations such as National Agriculture Marketing Board (NAMBOARD), Zambia Cooperative Federation (ZCF) and Lima Bank. These institutions had both a regional and national character, and were spatially more widely distributed. After the introduction of multi party politics and liberalization economic policies in 1991, the institutions collapsed due to withdraw of subsidies by government and, new, largely privately owned institutions, emerged such as Miombo and Omnia Fertilizer companies, Maize Research Institute (MRI), among others. Institutions which emerged after 1991 were more limited in distribution but more financially independent and sustainable. However, after 1997, the government intervened in the agricultural industry again by establishing the Food Reserve Agency (FRA) and Farmer Input Support Programme (FISP). FRA was the conduit through which government bought crops especially maize while FISP was used to distribute subsidized maize seed and eight bags of chemical fertilizers to selected members of cooperatives. The study concludes that different agricultural support institutions have existed at different periods of Zambia’s history and their spatial distribution has been changing depending on their resource base.
Highlights
1.1 General Introduction and BackgroundAgricultural support institutions world over evolve with time in terms of their nature, scope, funding, spatial distribution, efficiency and management
The study intended to identify the names of agricultural support institutions which existed in Central Province, as a smaller unit, and Zambia in general, and analyze their spatial aspect
This study focused on identifying the various institutions which have been involved in supporting small scale crop agriculture in Zambia since independence, in general, and Central Province, in particular
Summary
Agricultural support institutions world over evolve with time in terms of their nature, scope, funding, spatial distribution, efficiency and management. Agricultural support institutions in Zambia have not been immune to such developments. This study focused on identifying the various institutions which have been involved in supporting small scale crop agriculture in Zambia since independence, in general, and Central Province, in particular. The study brought out specific names of the institutions, years when they were established, their geographical distribution, funding, control and their functions. The main thesis of this current study is that institutions which existed in the colonial period differed from those which emerged after independence. The study argues that institutions of the immediate post independence period between 1964 and 1973 differed from those which emerged in the period of one party rule between 1973 and 1990; and these differed from those which emerged in the period of multi party politics of liberalization after 1991
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.