A comparative study between computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound in the detection of a mural nodule in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm –Multicenter observational study in Japan

Abstract

Background/objectivesThe detection of malignancy is a major concern in the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). The height of the mural nodule (MN), estimated using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT), has been considered crucial for predicting malignant IPMN. Currently, whether surveillance using CT or EUS alone is sufficient for detecting MNs remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the ability of CT and EUS to detect MNs in IPMN. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted in 11 Japanese tertiary institutions. Patients who underwent surgical resection of IPMN with MN after CT and EUS examinations were eligible to participate. The MN detection rates between CT and EUS were examined. ResultsTwo-hundred-and-forty patients who underwent preoperative EUS and CT had pathologically confirmed MNs. The MN detection rates of EUS and CT were 83% and 53%, respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, the MN detection rate of EUS was significantly higher than that of CT regardless of morphological type (76% vs. 47% in branch-duct-type IPMN; 90% vs. 54% in mixed IPMN; 98% vs. 56% in main-duct-type IPMN; p < 0.001). Further, pathologically confirmed MNs ≥5 mm were more frequently observed on EUS than on CT (95% vs. 76%, p < 0.001). ConclusionsEUS was superior to CT for the detection of MN in IPMN. EUS surveillance is essential for the detection of MNs.