A comparative reactivity study of microperoxidases based on hemin, mesohemin and deuterohemin

Abstract

Three microperoxidases – hemin-6(7)-gly-gly-his methyl ester (HGGH), mesohemin-6(7)-gly-gly-his methyl ester (MGGH) and deuterohemin-6(7)-gly-gly-his methyl ester (DGGH) – have been prepared as models for heme-containing peroxidases by condensation of glycyl-glycyl- l-histidine methyl ester with the propionic side chains of hemin, mesohemin and deuterohemin, respectively. The three microperoxidases differ in two substituents, R, of the protoporphyrin IX framework (HGGH: R = vinyl, MGGH: R = ethyl, DGGH: R = H). X-band and high field EPR spectra show that the microperoxidases exhibit spectroscopic properties similar to those of metmyoglobin, i.e. a high spin ferric S = 5/2 signal at g ⊥ = 6 and g ∥ = 2 and an estimated D value of 7.5 ± 1 cm −1. The catalytic activities of the microperoxidases towards K 4[Fe(CN) 6], l-tyrosine methyl ester and 2,2′-azino(bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) (ABTS) have been investigated. It was found that all three microperoxidases exhibit peroxidase activity and that the reactions follow the generally accepted peroxidase reaction scheme [Biochem. J. 145 (1975) 93–103] with the exception that the initial formation of a Compound I analogue is the rate-limiting step for the whole process. The general activity trend was found to be MGGH ≈ DGGH > HGGH. For each microperoxidase, DFT calculations (B3LYP) were made on the reactions of compounds 0, I and II with H +, e − and H + + e −, respectively, in order to probe the possible relationship between the nature of the 2- and 4-substituents of the hemin and the observed reactivity. The computational modeling indicates that the relative energy differences are very small; solvation and electrostatic effects may be factors that decide the relative activities of the microperoxidases.