Abstract
The legal argument of the paper will be built around a comparative method, pointing towards the disparities and similarities between international refugee law (including the United Nations and the Council of Europe legal framework) and European asylum law. The final goal is to see how European asylum law has been shaped and defined as a compromise between the conflicting views of Member States, but also in reference to international norms. The literature used to support this method consists of doctrine, jurisprudence and other legal instruments, such as the applicable conventions, treaties, directives, regulations, etc.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
