Abstract

Two-point incremental forming (TPIF) shows higher forming limits than single-point incremental forming (SPIF) especially for producing complex industrial functional components. However, unexpected failure still occurs occasionally under certain forming conditions in TPIF. In this paper, the applicability of six damage models for failure prediction in TPIF is evaluated. The procedure of damage parameter calibration and finite element modelling are presented. The predicted failure depth and location with these damage models are evaluated under different loading conditions. Furthermore, the stress and strain and damage evolution in TPIF are provided and discussed in detail. It is concluded that the failure location and depth can be predicted more accurately by the Ayada model than others in this work. It is noted that once double-sided contact occurs in TPIF, it reduces the variation of triaxiality through the thickness, altering the accumulation of damage.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.