Abstract
The use of an appropriate graft material helps in an adequate amount of osseointegration. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a synthetic allograft (PerioGlas), and Bio-Oss, a bioresorbable xenograft in immediate implant procedures. In this randomized, prospective study, 90 patients were categorized into three groups with 30 samples in each asGroup A:patients who received PRP with an immediate implant; Group B: immediate implants with synthetic allograft (PerioGlas); and Group C: patients with immediate implants placed using bioresorbable xenograft (Bio-Oss). Postoperative follow-up was done based on plaque and gingival index, measurement of probing depths, and resorption of bone. Obtained data were statistically analyzed using the "one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)" test. Inter-group statistical comparisons between gingival and plaque indices at three, six, and 12 months of follow-up in the study groups demonstrated no statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean probing depths and resorption of bone at three, six, and 12 months of follow-up were statistically nonsignificant (p > 0.05) on the inter-group comparison. It could be concluded from the present study that there is no statistical superiority observed among PRP, PerioGlas, or Bio-Oss in terms of their usage as a graft material along with immediate implant placement procedure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
