A Comparative Assessment of Outcomes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion in Pierre Robin Sequence.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) to resolve upper airway obstruction in patients with Robin sequence (RS). A retrospective cohort study was performed of subjects presenting to a tertiary care pediatric center who underwent either primary MDO or TLA for the treatment of RS between 2004 and 2020. N=59 subjects met inclusion criteria (n=34 MDO, n=25 TLA), and there were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics other than age at surgery (MDO 31d vs. TLA 17d, P=0.049). Preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was similar between cohorts (33.9 and 46.7, P=0.38). Subjects who underwent MDO demonstrated improved AHI on initial postoperative polysomnogram performed at 2 weeks (3.4 vs. 11.6, P=0.014), however AHI at the second postoperative timepoint (270 vs. 142d, P=0.007) was no different between cohorts (2.8 vs. 2.6, P=0.89). No subject in either group required enteral nutrition or supplemental oxygen at last follow-up. In subjects undergoing MDO, 14.7% demonstrated temporary asymmetric marginal mandibular nerve dysfunction. Forty-seven percent of MDO patients had injury to first primary molars. MDO and TLA both ultimately achieved similar long-term resolution of upper airway obstruction and associated feeding difficulties in patients with Robin sequence. MDO offered a more immediate airway improvement, but the procedure carried a potential risk of neurosensory and dental injury when compared with TLA.