Abstract

As one of the most abundant predators of insects in terrestrial ecosystems, spiders have long received much attention from agricultural scientists and ecologists. Do spiders have a certain controlling effect on the main insect pests of concern in farmland ecosystems? Answering this question requires us to fully understand the prey spectrum of spiders. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been successfully employed to analyze spider prey spectra. However, the high sequencing costs make it difficult to analyze the prey spectrum of various spider species with large samples in a given farmland ecosystem. We performed a comparative analysis of the prey spectra of Ovia alboannulata (Araneae, Lycosidae) using NGS with individual and mixed DNA samples to demonstrate which treatment was better for determining the spider prey spectra in the field. We collected spider individuals from tea plantations, and two treatments were then carried out: (1) The DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then sequenced separately (DESISS) and (2) the DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then mixed and sequenced (DESIMS). The results showed that the number of prey families obtained by the DESISS treatment was approximately twice that obtained by the DESIMS treatment. Therefore, the DESIMS treatment greatly underestimated the prey composition of the spiders, although its sequencing costs were obviously lower. However, the relative abundance of prey sequences detected in the two treatments was slightly different only at the family level. Therefore, we concluded that if our purpose were to obtain the most accurate prey spectrum of the spiders, the DESISS treatment would be the best choice. However, if our purpose were to obtain only the relative abundance of prey sequences of the spiders, the DESIMS treatment would also be an option. The present study provides an important reference for choosing applicable methods to analyze the prey spectra and food web compositions of animal in ecosystems.

Highlights

  • Biological control involves the use of natural enemies to control pest species, and it has gained recognition as an essential component of integrated pest management (IPM) (Hoy & Herzog, 2012)

  • Considering the high cost of this technology, we performed a comparative analysis of spider prey spectra using Next-­generation sequencing (NGS) with individual and mixed DNA samples to demonstrate which treatment was better for determining the spider's prey spectrum in the field

  • The present study showed that the prey compositions obtained were obviously different between the DESISS and DESIMS treatments at the family level

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Biological control involves the use of natural enemies to control pest species, and it has gained recognition as an essential component of integrated pest management (IPM) (Hoy & Herzog, 2012). Many spider species have been reported in farmland ecosystems, such as tea plantations, cotton fields, and rice fields, and they represent the most abundant predatory arthropods (Song et al, 2020; Wang et al, 1996; Yang, Shi, et al, 2020; Zhao, 1995) This means that spiders can be used as biological control agents for agricultural pests. The cost of NGS is gradually decreasing, it is still relatively high (currently, it costs approximately 80 dollars per DNA sample to sequence the prey barcode region when use Illumina platform) This makes it difficult to analyze the prey spectrum of various spider species with large samples in a given farmland ecosystem using this technology. The prey spectrum of O. alboannulata was obtained, and it was determined which treatment was better for determining the spider's prey spectrum

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call