A comparative analysis of simple ranking process and faire un Choix Adéquat method

Abstract

This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, called the Simple Ranking Process (SRP) and Faire Un Choix Adéquat (FUCA). Two examples are used to reveal the similarities and differences between these two methods. The findings established that both methods share the use of an internal ranking system as a fundamental procedure. However, beyond this commonality, significant differences distinguish these methods from each other. These differences include variations in the number of steps within their algorithms, distinct approaches used in executing the internal ranking system, discrepancies in the alternative scores, different behavior when dealing with complex decision-making problems, and differences in the generated rankings.