Abstract
This paper compares the Kanjur Marg Project in Mumbai and the 26 Local Strategies: A Plan in Rosario from a globalization perspective. Despite both projects reflecting postmodernist planning characteristics, they highlight the similarities and differences in their urban planning approaches. The differences in resident participation in the two cities reflect their unique social, political, and global contexts. The Kanjur Marg Project in Mumbai combines collaborative and radical planning through deep Metropolitan resident participation. At the same time, the 26 Local Strategies: A Plan in Rosario represents a more typical collaborative planning approach through participatory workshops. This paper analyses how these planning approaches shape urban development trajectories and to what extent they achieve social justice from the perspectives of representation, redistribution, and recognition in the context of globalization. The study suggests that these cases demonstrate the multiple challenges of urban development and social justice in the context of globalization and call for further exploration of how to achieve more inclusive and just urban planning in the process of globalization
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Advances in Information Management and Economic Development Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
