Abstract
Two non-parametric estimation techniques were tested in two study areas in Ireland. For each area, plot level estimates of standing volume per hectare and basal area per hectare were computed from the National Forest Inventory field data and combined with SPOT 4 XS satellite imagery and a digital elevation model to form a set of observations. These observations were then used to predict variables across the satellite image using k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN) estimation and a Random Forest algorithm. Comparisons between the two techniques were assessed based on the estimation errors primarily using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and relative mean deviation (bias). In both study areas it was found that the RMSE was lower for kNN than for RF. Overall, the RMSEs and mean deviations were lower in Study Area 1 when compared to Study Area 2, largely due to a difference in the number of available NFI reference plots.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
