Abstract

In this study, the extent of flexible working patterns beginning to replace the conventional working models is examined in companies in Turkey and Germany and the extent of flexible working patterns in the two countries is compared. The objectives of the study are to determine the prevalence of these patterns and to find out the similarities and differences regarding flexible working in the two countries. The flexible working patterns focused on in this study are weekend work, shiftwork, overtime work, part-time work, job sharing, flexitime, fixed-term contracts, home-based work, telecommuting, and compressed workweeks. The research, which is designed with the last round database of the CRANET Survey on Comparative Human Resource Management Research, includes the companies in Turkey and Germany of the 35 participating countries (154 companies from Turkey and 278 companies from Germany which makes a total of 432 companies). In the findings section, first of all, the prevalence of each flexible working pattern in the two countries has been presented. Chi-square analysis has been conducted for each of the flexible working patterns to find out if there are any significant differences in the prevalence of these models in the two countries. As a result, it is determined that the extent of the nine flexible working patterns differed in the two countries. This is to say that the prevalence of several flexible working patterns ensuring the work-life balance of the employees is higher in Germany whereas flexible patterns used for economic reasons and do not add value to the work-life balance of the employees are usually prevalent in Turkey. The only similarity between the two countries is the use of home-based work.

Highlights

  • As economic, social and technological advances have taken place for the last 40 years, different forms of employment have been required around the world

  • In Turkey, % 29 of the companies have majority of their employees work at the weekend whereas only % 15 of the companies from Germany have the majority of their workforce work at the weekend

  • The results reveal that the respondent companies in Germany provide part-time work, flexitime arrangements and telecommuting models more than the respondent companies in Turkey

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social and technological advances have taken place for the last 40 years, different forms of employment have been required around the world. These flexible working patterns, in other words forms of atypical employment models, have been used since 1970’s by especially European countries. Comprehensive regulations have long been established in Germany. For instance regulations regarding flexible patterns came into force in 1994 with the enactment of Working Time Law in Germany (Centel, 1999) whereas in Turkey regulations regarding most of the flexible working patterns were established in 2003 with the enactment of the Labor Law no. For instance regulations regarding flexible patterns came into force in 1994 with the enactment of Working Time Law in Germany (Centel, 1999) whereas in Turkey regulations regarding most of the flexible working patterns were established in 2003 with the enactment of the Labor Law no. 4857

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call