Abstract

Aims.We present a comprehensive analysis of the performance of noise-reduction (denoising) algorithms to determine whether they provide advantages in source detection, mitigating noise on extragalactic survey images.Methods.The methods we analyze here are representative of different algorithmic families: Perona-Malik filtering, bilateral filter, total variation denoising, structure-texture image decomposition, non-local means, wavelets, and block-matching We tested the algorithms on simulated images of extragalactic fields with resolution and depth typical of theHubble,Spitzer, andEuclidSpace Telescopes, and of ground-based instruments. After choosing their best internal parameters configuration, we assessed their performance as a function of resolution, background level, and image type, in addition to testing their ability to preserve the objects fluxes and shapes. Finally, we analyze, in terms of completeness and purity, the catalogs that were extracted after applying denoising algorithms on a simulatedEuclidWide Survey VIS image and on real H160 andK-band (HAWK-I) observations of the CANDELS GOODS-South field.Results.Denoising algorithms often outperform the standard approach of filtering with the point spread function (PSF) of the image. Applying structure-texture image decomposition, Perona-Malik filtering, the total variation method by Chambolle, and bilateral filtering on theEuclid-VIS image, we obtain catalogs that are both more pure and complete by 0.2 magnitude than those based on the standard approach. The same result is achieved with the structure-texture image decomposition algorithm applied on the H160 image. The relative advantage of denoising techniques with respect to PSF filtering rises with increasing depth. Moreover, these techniques better preserve the shape of the detected objects with respect to PSF smoothing.Conclusions.Denoising algorithms provide significant improvements in the detection of faint objects and enhance the scientific return of current and future extragalactic surveys. We identify the most promising denoising algorithms among the 20 techniques considered in this study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call