Abstract
ABSTRACT In many studies involving historical and climatological subjects, it is known that deck log records are used as a major source. The deck log books have also appeared as one of the key sources of marine accident investigations. Recently, many international conventions impose obligations for different types of records. It is seen that record requirements do not come from a single written source. As a result, different applications and deficiencies arise. Keeping incomplete records is reflected as a deficiency in PSC inspection reports, and even in some cases, it leads to the detention of ships. The aim of this study is to collect the deck-log recording requirements from different sources, classify them under main titles and compare their distribution by a quantitative approach. Recording requirements were obtained from SOLAS, MARPOL, ILO, MLC, COLREG, P&I, and Flag states, a total of 135 record examples were collected for different stages of ship operation. One unanticipated finding was that SOLAS Chapter 5 and ICS Bridge Procedures Guide are not a sufficient guide for up-to-date deck log recording requirements. The study provides a systematic analysis of recording standards, unlike previous studies that use deck recordings only as data sources.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
