Abstract
Hong Kong’s response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic contrasts to the response of Thai hoteliers and officials to the deadly December 2004 tsunami. Whereas Hong Kong took assertive actions to offset the negative effects of the SARS publicity, efforts in Thailand have been minimal, at best. As explained in this commentary, Hong Kong targeted long-haul travelers, rather than regional markets, and conducted research studies to determine how to win back those travelers’ business. Thai officials, by contrast, have offered promotions that lack a research basis.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly
Paper Title
Journal
Date
