Abstract
In a recent paper in this journal, Edward Nadel proposes an operationalization of Kuhnian incommensurability in terms of citation behaviour.IAccording to Nadel this operationalization should be of service in evaluating the relative historical adequacy of Kuhn's view of competition between theories, according to which incommensurability is an influential factor, as compared to views that deny a role of such a factor, like the position defended by Popper. In this Response I argue that the validity of the operationalization, and its merits for discriminating between the theories of scientific development under discussion, are throughout in doubt. Kuhn's notion of incommensurability is characterized by Nadel as follows:
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
