Abstract
Surface irrigation worldwide exhibits low efficiency due to excessively deep percolation and runoff. To optimize surface irrigation practice, two questions must be answered simultaneously: when to irrigate and how to irrigate (what stream size to use and for how long) to meet crop water requirements. Current surface irrigation optimization models are one-dimensional, meaning they can only simulate surface water flow, neglecting subsurface flow. They therefore indicate only how to irrigate, not when to irrigate. Furthermore, the required depth of irrigation is needed as input data for optimization, though this parameter is difficult to establish accurately. In addition, the effects of different irrigation practices on crop transpiration and yield, and variations in these across an irrigated field, are unknown. The present study adopts two one-dimensional simulation models – WinSRFR (for surface flow) and SWAP (for subsurface flow) – to determine when and how best to irrigate in a blocked-end furrow irrigation system for sugarcane cultivation in southwestern Iran. SWAP is used to determine irrigation schedule, required irrigation depth and crop transpiration along furrows, while WinSRFR is used to determine the soil infiltration function and evaluate and optimize irrigation practice. The results of the combined model approach indicate that some 2.7 times more water is applied than required in current practice, imposing high waterlogging stress on sugarcane crops. According to the SWAP simulations, the required irrigation depth is some 75 mm and the number of irrigation applications can be reduced from 26 to 19. The irrigation optimization in WinSRFR indicates that irrigation depth can be reduced from 162 mm to 81 mm, resulting in application efficiency increasing from 47% to 92%. Furthermore, as furrow slope increases from 0.02% to 0.12%, optimized stream size decreases from 3.0 to 1.6 l/s and optimized irrigation cutoff times increase from 3.2 to 6.5 hrs. Overall, optimization of irrigation practice using the combined model approach could result in 63% water conservation and 22% higher sugarcane yield.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.