Abstract

Background and objectivesThe conical stemmed design of the tibial component for total ankle replacement (TAR) (example Mobility design) uses a single intramedullary stem for primary fixation. Tibial component loosening is a common mode of failure for TAR. Primary causes of loosening are lack of bone ingrowth due to excessive micromotion at the implant-bone interface and bone resorption due to stress shielding after implantation. The fixation feature of the conical stemmed design can be modified with the addition of small pegs to avoid loosening. The aim of the study is to select the improved design for conical stemmed TAR using a combined Finite Element (FE) hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework. MethodsThe geometry and material properties of the bone for FE modeling were extracted from the CT data. Thirty-two design alternatives with varying pegs in number (one, two, four, eight), location (anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, equally spaced), and height (5 mm, 4 mm, 3 mm, 2 mm) were prepared. All models were analyzed for dorsiflexion, neutral, and plantarflexion loading. The proximal part of the tibia was fixed. The implant-bone interface coefficient of friction was taken as 0.5. The implant-bone micromotion, stress shielding, volume of bone resection, and surgical simplicity were the important criteria considered for evaluating the performance of TAR. The designs were compared using a hybrid MCDM method of WASPAS, TOPSIS, EDAS, and VIKOR. The weight calculations were based on fuzzy AHP and the final ranks on the Degree of Membership method. ResultsThe addition of pegs decreased the mean implant-bone micromotions and increased stress shielding. There was a marginal decrease in micromotion and a marginal increase in stress shielding when the peg heights were increased. The results of hybrid MCDM indicated that the most preferable alternative designs were two pegs of 4 mm height in the AP direction to the main stem, two pegs of 4 mm height in the ML direction, and one peg of 3 mm height in the A direction. ConclusionsOutcomes of this study suggest that the addition of pegs can reduce the implant-bone micromotions. Modified three designs would be useful by considering implant-bone micromotions, stress shielding, volume of bone resection, and surgical simplicity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call