Abstract
Introduction:Primary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are the two common and distinct forms of hereditary cardiomyopathies caused by defined pathogenic variants (PVs) typically in different sets of genes. DCM is characterized by left ventricular dilatation, dysfunction, and failure, whereas ARVC classically involves the right ventricle and is characterized by fibrofatty infiltration of the myocardium. DCM is caused primarily by the PVs in genes encoding sarcomere and cytoskeletal protein, while ARVC is mainly a disease of the desmosome proteins. DCM and ARVC exhibit partial phenotypic and genetic overlaps.Aim:To analyze the genetic basis of the phenotypic heterogeneity of cardiomyopathy in members of a single family.Methods and Results:We recruited, clinically characterized, and performed whole-exome sequencing in five affected, three probably affected, and two clinically unaffected members of a single family. The family members mainly exhibited late-onset DCM associated with conduction defects and arrhythmias. One family member who died suddenly was diagnosed with the classic ARVC at autopsy and another presented with isolated ventricular tachycardia. A novel splicing (truncating) and a rare missense variant in the TTN gene, likely in cis, co-segregated with the phenotype in all affected and probably affected family members and were likely the causal variants. Several PVs and LPVs in other genes involved in cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias were also identified that seem to modify the expression of the phenotype. Notably, LPVs in the DSP and PKP2 genes, which are known genes for ARVC, were identified in the family member who also carried the TTN variants but developed the classic ARVC.Conclusion:The findings indicate the causal role of the TTN variants, exhibiting an age-dependent penetrance in late-onset DCM, and highlight the potential modifying role of the concomitant LPVs in additional genes on the expression of the phenotype, including a phenotypic switch from the anticipated DCM to ARVC. The findings support an oligogenic basis of the cardiac phenotype in hereditary cardiomyopathies. A comprehensive genetic analysis involving all PVs and LPVs along with detailed phenotypic characterization is necessary to gain insights into the molecular pathogenesis of hereditary cardiomyopathies.
Highlights
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are the two common and distinct forms of hereditary cardiomyopathies caused by defined pathogenic variants (PVs) typically in different sets of genes
The family members mainly exhibited late-onset DCM associated with conduction defects and arrhythmias
One family member who died suddenly was diagnosed with the classic ARVC at autopsy and another presented with isolated ventricular tachycardia
Summary
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are the two common and distinct forms of hereditary cardiomyopathies caused by defined pathogenic variants (PVs) typically in different sets of genes. DCM is characterized by left ventricular dilatation, dysfunction, and failure, whereas ARVC classically involves the right ventricle and is characterized by fibrofatty infiltration of the myocardium. HCM and DCM represent the opposite ends of the phenotypic spectrum of the cardiac response to genetic mutations. The former is characterized by cardiac hypertrophy with a preserved or enhanced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the latter manifests as a dilated heart with a thin wall and a reduced LVEF[1,2]. The pathological hallmark of ARVC is fibro-fatty infiltration of the right ventricular myocardium[4]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.