Abstract

ObjectiveTo study the diagnostic parameters of a number of instruments for a diagnosis of dementia in general practice and the added diagnostic value of these tests. Study design and settingCross-sectional diagnostic research in general practice. Participants: 152 persons aged 65 plus. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Clock Drawing Test, the ADMP scale, the Timed Up and Go Test, the Extrapyramidal Sign Scale, the Behavior Observation Scale, the Poon–Baro–Wens computer battery, and the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Assessment System were evaluated against the Dutch version of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX-N). Diagnostic characteristics were calculated with their 95% CI. Using forward stepwise logistic regression analysis, a model was built with CAMDEX-N as the dependent variable and the tests under study as independent variables. Area under the curve was the main parameter for the comparisons. ResultsThe main diagnostic gain results from age and ADMP, followed by the Clock Drawing Test. Subsequent addition of the MMSE and computer tests results in modest additional gain only. The final model including five tests has an area under the curve of 0.95. ConclusionSophisticated neuropsychological computerized tests have little added value in the diagnostic work-up of dementia in general practice. Basic clinical tests used in an appropriate sequence can be very valuable in establishing the diagnosis of dementia.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.