Abstract

Differentiation of Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) is a big challenge to gastroenterologists because of their indistinguishable features and insensitive diagnostic tools. A non-invasive biomarker is urgently required to distinguish ITB/CD patients particularly in India, a TB endemic region, where CD frequency is increasing rapidly due to urbanization. Among the three differentially expressed miRNAs obtained from small RNA transcriptomic profiling of ileocaecal/terminal ileal tissue of ITB/CD patients (n = 3), only two down-regulated miRNAs, miR-31-5p, and miR-215-5p showed comparable data in qRT-PCR. Out of which, only miR-215-5p was detectable in the patient’s plasma, but there was no significant difference in expression between ITB/CD. On the other hand, miR-375-3p, the pulmonary TB specific marker was found in higher amount in the plasma of ITB patients than CD while reverse expression was observed in the ileocaecal/terminal ileal tissues of the same patients. Next, using Bioplex pro-human cytokine 48-plex screening panel, only three chemokines, Eotaxin-1/CCL11, SDF-1α/CXCL12, and G-CSF have noted significantly different levels in the serum of ITB/CD patients. ROC analysis has revealed that compared to a single molecule, a combination of miR-375-3p + Eotaxin-1/CCL11 + SDF-1α /CXCL12 + G-CSF showed a better AUC of 0.83, 95% CI (0.69–0.96) with 100% specificity and positive predictive value while sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 56%, 69%, and 78% respectively in distinguishing ITB from CD. This study suggests that a combination of plasma markers shows better potential in differentiating ITB from CD than a single marker and this panel of markers may be used for clinical management of ITB/CD patients.

Highlights

  • Differentiation of Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) is a big challenge to gastroenterologists because of their indistinguishable features and insensitive diagnostic tools

  • A meta-analysis study with pathological features from biopsy samples revealed that confluent, large, multiple granulomas; granuloma with surrounding cuffing lymphocytes, and caseating necrosis are common in Intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) and the diagnostic specificity of these features have been found high (99%, 95%, and 100% respectively) but sensitivity was very poor (38%, 41%, and 21% respectively) the area under curve (AUC) was high (0.94, 0.90 and 0.99 respectively) in each ­case[13]

  • All the ITB patients were positive in multiplex PCR with IS6110 and MBP64 primers while CD patients were negative

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Differentiation of Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) is a big challenge to gastroenterologists because of their indistinguishable features and insensitive diagnostic tools. ROC analysis has revealed that compared to a single molecule, a combination of miR-375-3p + Eotaxin-1/CCL11 + SDF-1α /CXCL12 + G-CSF showed a better AUC of 0.83, 95% CI (0.69–0.96) with 100% specificity and positive predictive value while sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 56%, 69%, and 78% respectively in distinguishing ITB from CD. CRP C-Reactive protein G-CSF Granulocyte colony stimulating factor HIV Human immunodeficiency virus IBD Inflammatory bowel disease ITB Intestinal tuberculosis LOXL-2 Lysyl oxidase homolog 2 miRNA Micro RNA MTB Mycobacterium tuberculosis NGS generation sequencing NPV Negative predictive value PCR Polymerase chain reaction PPV Positive predictive value pTB Pulmonary tuberculosis qRT-PCR Quantitative real-time PCR RIN RNA integrity ROC Receiver operating curve analysis SDF-1α Stromal cell derived factor-1α. In 2018, Tiwari et al first tested the non-invasive biomolecule for similar goal They showed ­CD4+CD25+CD127-FOXP3+T reg cells in the peripheral blood have high diagnostic potential (75% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity) in separating CD and I­TB4. Exploring the serum proteomic profiling of 30 CD and 21 ITB samples, Zhang et al in 2016 has identified two proteins, [Appetite peptide and Lysyl Oxidase Like 2 (LOXL-2)] which are deregulated in ITB/CD and showed high prediction potential with 76% sensitivity and 80% s­ pecificity[18], but none of them were validated due to technical limitations

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.