Abstract

IntroductionThe literature regarding undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is sparse. The aim of this prospective feasibility study is to compare the clinical outcome after undisplaced FNF treated with internal fixation (IF) and displaced FNF treated with hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that hip arthroplasty would give a lower incidence of reoperations.MethodsA total of 235 patients were included with a median age of 84 years (range 65–99). A consecutive series of 65 patients with undisplaced FNF were treated with IF, and 170 patients with displaced FNF were treated with either a total hip arthroplasty or a hemiarthroplasty. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 1 year using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), WOMAC, and pain numeric rating scale (PNRS). The minimum follow-up time was 22 months. There was no difference in baseline data between the groups.ResultsNineteen (8%) hips required reoperation at least once at a mean of 6 months (range 0–35). The rate of reoperation was higher in the IF group compared to the hip arthroplasty group (13.8% vs. 5.9%, 95% CI 0.9–6.4). The overall 1-year and 2-year mortality was 28% and 40%, respectively, with no difference between the groups. The most common reasons for reoperations in the IF group were non-union and avascular necrosis, and 6 patients were treated with hip or excision arthroplasty. In the arthroplasty group, the most common indications were deep infection and dislocation. We did not find any differences between the groups in terms of HHS, WOMAC, and PNRS.ConclusionsIn this feasibility study, we found no differences in patient-reported outcomes between the groups although IF required a higher rate of reoperations. Further randomized trials are needed to establish the optimal treatment of undisplaced FNF in the elderly.Trial registrationClinicalTrial.org, NCT03392285. Retrospectively registered on 5 February 2018.

Highlights

  • The literature regarding undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is sparse

  • Rationale for a pilot study The aim of the present prospective pilot study is to compare the clinical outcome after undisplaced and minimally displaced FNF treated with internal fixation (IF) and displaced FNF treated with hip arthroplasty, in order to provide baseline data for a sample size calculations for a large national registry-based randomized controlled study [10]

  • Sixty-five patients with undisplaced FNF were treated with IF, and 170 patients with displaced FNF were treated with hip arthroplasty (152 received HA and 18 Total hip arthroplasty (THA))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The literature regarding undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is sparse. The aim of this prospective feasibility study is to compare the clinical outcome after undisplaced FNF treated with internal fixation (IF) and displaced FNF treated with hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that hip arthroplasty would give a lower incidence of reoperations. The incidence and healthcare burden of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are forecasted to increase in the future due to an aging population [1]. Doubts have been raised regarding the results of the internal fixation of minimally displaced FNF [2]. Modern hip arthroplasty provides a hip that provides immediate unrestricted mobilization and may lower rates of reoperation, despite the increased risk for postoperative infection [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call