A Coasean Experiment on Contract Presumptions

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessA Coasean Experiment on Contract PresumptionsStewart SchwabStewart Schwab Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 17, Number 2Jun., 1988 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/468129 Views: 11Total views on this site Citations: 30Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jonathan Hardman Articles of Association in UK Private Companies: An Empirical Leximetric Study, European Business Organization Law Review 22, no.33 (May 2021): 517–557.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00213-3Elodie Bertrand Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests), (Dec 2021): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-2Ramzi Mabsout, Hossein Radmard Experimenting with the Coase theorem, Journal of Economic Methodology 27, no.11 (Apr 2019): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1608457Mark Harcourt, Gregor Gall, Adrian Wilkinson, Richard Croucher, Helen Lam Using the endowment effect to explain managerial resistance towards codetermination: Implications for employment relations from the German case, Human Resource Management Journal 30, no.11 (Oct 2019): 149–163.https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12261Jonathan Hardman The Law and Economics of Grindr: A Response to Carson, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no.33 (Jan 2021): 445–453.https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110519876178Elodie Bertrand Coase Theorem: Empirical Tests, (Apr 2019): 256–262.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_628Eyal Zamir Law and Behavioral Economics, (Oct 2017): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_99-2Alon Harel, Yuval Procaccia, Ilana Ritov On the Economic Effects of Disobeyed Regulation in Employment Law, Review of Law & Economics 13, no.22 (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2016-0008Isabel Marcin, Andreas Nicklisch Testing the Endowment Effect for Default Rules, Review of Law & Economics 13, no.22 (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2016-0010Elodie Bertrand Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests), (Jul 2017): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-1Eyal Zamir Law and Behavioral Economics, (Jun 2017): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_99-1Oren Bar-Gill, Christoph Engel Bargaining in the Absence of Property Rights: An Experiment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2701720Élodie Bertrand Autorisation à l'échange sur des externalités, Revue économique Vol. 65, no.22 (Feb 2014): 439–459.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.652.0439Isabel Marcin, Andreas Nicklisch Testing the Endowment Effect for Default Rules, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2375107Alon Harel, Yuval Procaccia, Ilana Ritov On the Economic Effects of Unenforced Mandatory Employment Legislation: Why Enforcement Does Not Matter (or, at Least, Matters Less than Expected ), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2542058Clotilde Champeyrache The Assumption of Law Neutrality: Property Rights Theory versus Legal-Economic Nexus, OEconomia 2013, no.0303 (Mar 2014): 391–419.https://doi.org/10.4074/S2113520713013029Clotilde Champeyrache The Assumption of Law Neutrality: Property Rights Theory Versus Legal-Economic Nexus, OEconomia , no.3-33-3 (Sep 2013): 391–419.https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.171STEVEN G. MEDEMA HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: THE COASE THEOREM LESSONS FOR THE STUDY OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 33, no.11 (Apr 2011): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383721000060XRachel Croson Experimental Law and Economics, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5, no.11 (Dec 2009): 25–44.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131609Richard H. McAdams, Janice Nadler Coordinating in the Shadow of the Law: Two Contextualized Tests of the Focal Point Theory of Legal Compliance, Law & Society Review 42, no.44 (Dec 2008): 865–898.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00361.xDaniel P. Kessler, Daniel L. Rubinfeld Chapter 5 Empirical Study of the Civil Justice System, (Jan 2007): 343–402.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01005-5Randolph Sloof, Hessel Oosterbeek, J. H. Sonnemans On the Importance of Default Breach Remedies, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.934326Ian Ayres Default Rules for Incomplete Contracts, (Jan 2017): 585–590.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_112Donald J. Cymrot, James A. Dunlevy, William E. Even 'Who's on first': an empirical test of the Coase Theorem in baseball, Applied Economics 33, no.55 (Apr 2001): 593–603.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840122414John Fabian Witt Rethinking the Nineteenth-Century Employment Contract, Again, Law and History Review 18, no.33 (Oct 2011): 627–657.https://doi.org/10.2307/744072Steven G. Medema Symposium on the Coase Theorem: Legal Fiction: The Place of the Coase Theorem in Law and Economics, Economics and Philosophy 15, no.22 (Dec 2008): 209–233.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100003989Frances Raday Status and Contract in the Employment Relationship, Israel Law Review 23, no.11 (Feb 2016): 77–110.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700009559Richard B. Freeman Searching for the EU Social Dialogue Model, (): 221–238.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1923-6_11Steven G Medema, Richard O Zerbe Educating Alice: Lessons from the Coase theorem, (): 69–112.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-5895(00)19003-7Steven G. Medema Alfred Marshall Meets Law and Economics: Rationality, Norms, and Theories as Tendency Statements, (): 235–252.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-2134(06)09009-0