Abstract

α-Helices are the most abundant structures found within proteins and play an important role in the determination of the global structure of proteins and their function. Representation of α-helical structures with the common (φ, ψ) dihedrals, as in Ramachandran maps, does not provide informative details regarding the helical structure apart for the abstract geometric meaning of the dihedrals. We present an alternative coordinate system that describes helical conformations in terms of residues per turn (ρ) and angle (ϑ) between backbone carbonyls relative to the helix direction through an approximate linear transformation between the two coordinates system (φ, ψ and ρ, ϑ). In this way, valuable information on the helical structure becomes directly available. Analysis of α-helical conformations acquired from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) demonstrates that a conformational energy function of the α-helix backbone can be harmonically approximated on the (ρ, ϑ) space, which is not applicable to the (φ, ψ) space due to the diagonal distribution of the conformations. The observed trends of helical conformations obtained from the PDB are captured by four conceptual simulations that theoretically examine the effects of residue bulkiness, external electric field, and externally applied mechanical forces. Flory’s isolated pair hypothesis is shown to be partially correct for α-helical conformations.

Highlights

  • The middle of the 20th century is considered to be the genesis of structural biology

  • Ramachandran map allows for distinguishing between regions of similar backbone conformations of polypeptide chains[9]

  • The Ramachandran map is a plot of dihedral angles φ and ψ, where φ is the C-N-Cα-C dihedral angle and ψ is the N-Cα-C-N dihedral angle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The middle of the 20th century is considered to be the genesis of structural biology During this period, Pauling and coworkers discovered the two most fundamental structures found within proteins: the α-helix and the β-sheet[1,2,3]. Further empirical studies[19,20] showed that the different AAs are found in different proportions within α-helices due to the energetic cost for inclusion of some given AA within the α-helix The latter allowed the definition of α-helix propensities for the different AAs. MET, ALA, LEU, GLU (E), and LYS (K) (or shortly MALEK in one-letter AA codes) are the AAs with the highest α-helix propensity while PRO and GLY are with the lowest. The purpose of this study is to provide a deeper look into the different conformations of α-helices

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call