Abstract

This article reports an extended investigation into the precision hard turning of AISI 4340 alloy steel when machined by two different types of inserts: wiper nose and conventional round nose. It provides a closer look at previously published work and aims at determining the optimal process parameters for simultaneously minimizing surface roughness and maximizing productivity. In the mathematical models developed by the authors, surface roughness at different cutting speeds, depths of cut and feed rates is treated as the objective function. Three robust multi-objective techniques, (1) multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), (2) multi-objective Pareto search algorithm (MOPSA) and (3) multi-objective emperor penguin colony algorithm (MOEPCA), were used to determine the optimal turning parameters when either the wiper or the conventional insert is used, and the results were experimentally validated. To investigate the practicality of the optimization algorithms, two turning scenarios were used. These were the machining of the combustion chamber of a gun barrel, first with an average roughness (Ra) of 0.4 µm and then with 0.8 µm, under conditions of high productivity. In terms of the simultaneous achievement of both high surface quality and productivity in precision hard turning of AISI 4340 alloy steel, this work illustrates that MOPSA provides the best optimal solution for the wiper insert case, and MOEPCA results are the best for the conventional insert. Furthermore, the results extracted from Pareto front plots show that the wiper insert is capable of successfully meeting both the requirements of Ra values of 0.4 µm and 0.8 µm and high productivity. However, the conventional insert could not meet the 0.4 µm Ra requirement; the recorded global minimum was Ra = 0.454 µm, which reveals the superiority of the wiper compared to the conventional insert.

Highlights

  • Customer demand for higher surface quality and increased productivity arises due to stringent requirements for recent precise and complicated applications [1]

  • An had extended through mathematical model of surface roughness a lowinvestigation error percentage withoptimization respect to theis crucial

  • The optimal running conditions when using the wiper insert achieved a 252% improvement in surface quality over the results obtained using the conventional round insert, with Ra for wiper insert = 0.3118 μm obtained by multi-objective Pareto search algorithm (MOPSA) and Ra for conventional insert = 0.7855 μm obtained by multi-objective emperor penguin colony algorithm (MOEPCA)

Read more

Summary

A Closer Look at Precision Hard Turning of AISI4340

Adel T. Abbas 1, * , Abdulhamid A. Al-Abduljabbar 1 , Ibrahim A. Alnaser 1 , Mohamed F. Aly 2 , Islam H. Abdelgaliel 2,3 and Ahmed Elkaseer 4,5 Citation: Abbas, A.T.; Al-Abduljabbar, A.A.; Alnaser, I.A.; Aly, M.F.; Abdelgaliel, I.H.; Elkaseer, A. A Closer Look at Precision Hard Productivity. Materials 2022, 15, 2106. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Karlsruhe, Germany

Introduction
Methods
Microstructure of Material
Machine
Experimental
Surface Roughness Characterization
Mathematical Models
Optimization Model Development
Results and Discussion
Microstructure Analysis
Experimental Results
Optical micrograph foriron
Optimization Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call