Abstract

A closed-form solution of the risk equation incorporating intensity bounds is derived and analysed. The new equation, compared to the well-known risk equation developed in the 1990s, includes a correction factor, which has a value less than one if the effect of the intensity bounds is significant. The lower bound of ground-motion intensity represents a minimum ground-motion intensity, which causes a designated limit state, whereas the upper bound of ground-motion intensity is, in general, related to the physics of earthquakes, the tectonic regime, and the geology of the terrain in the region from the epicentre to the site of the building. In the paper typical values of the minimum collapse intensity and of the fragility parameters of code-conforming frames are discussed. An approximate procedure for assessing the upper bound of ground-motion intensity on the basis of ground-motion prediction models is also proposed. Finally, the procedure for seismic risk assessment is demonstrated by assessing the collapse risk for a 4-storey and a 15-storey building. It is shown that the collapse risk assessed on the basis of peak ground acceleration can be significantly affected by the lower bound of the collapse intensity, whereas the impact of the upper bound of the ground-motion intensity on the collapse risk can be more pronounced when the assessment of the collapse risk is based on the spectral acceleration at the first vibration period.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.