A clinical and pharmacokinetic basis for the selection and use of slow release theophylline products.

Abstract

In order to achieve the greatest chance for maximum benefit from theophylline in the management of chronic asthma, the serum concentration should be maintained in the therapeutic range of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml. Conventional rapid release formulations produce excessive fluctuations in serum concentrations that can result in variability in clinical response between doses. In contrast, slow release formulations have the potential to achieve relatively constant serum concentrations with 12-hour dosing intervals, thus providing around-the-clock stabilisation of the hyper-reactive airways that characterise chronic asthma. Furthermore, the decreased frequency of dosing with these formulations can improve patient compliance. However, significant differences in rate and extent of absorption exist between the available formulations. Single-dose bioavailability studies comparing a slow release product with an oral solution or plain uncoated tablet in a crossover design permit examination of the rate and extent of absorption. Comparison of a slow release product with an oral reference following multiple doses at steady-state permits examination of the extent but generally not rate of absorption. The mean fraction absorbed-time profile, calculated from a modification of the Wagner-Nelson equation, is a process-independent method of comparing rates of absorption of different products after single doses. A prospective study in 14 children with chronic asthma has demonstrated that this modified equation, when rearranged to iteratively solve for serum concentrations, can accurately predict steady-state serum concentrations for different dosing intervals in patient populations with different rates of elimination. When slow release products are compared in this manner at 8- or 12-hour dosing intervals for patients with slow elimination, clinically relevant differences between brands are not apparent. However, in patients with rapid elimination, i.e. children, cigarette smokers, and 25% of non-smoking adults, application of this method shows that only some formulations (i.e. 'Slo-Bid Gyrocaps' and 'Theo-Dur', which is also marketed under different brand names names such as 'Sustaire', 'Pulmi-Dur' and 'Theolin Retard') can maintain serum concentrations within the therapeutic range for an entire 12-hour dosing interval. More rapidly absorbed slow release products must be administered at 8-hour dosing intervals in patients with rapid elimination, despite promotional claims to the contrary. Current products promoted for once-a-day administration are clinically inadequate because of incomplete and erratic absorption, and/or excessive serum concentration fluctuations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)