Abstract

A clash of rights in the legal and spatial planning contexts: The case of the Philippi Horticultural Area

Highlights

  • In the run-up to South Africa’s first democratic elections in April 1994, the Conference for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) negotiated the content of the interim Constitution,2 which operated for a period of almost three years, before the Constitutional Assembly adopted the “final” Constitution of the Republic of South Africa3 that came into force on 4 February 1997.4 The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, with a highly progressive Bill of Rights that has been described as “second to none”.5 Sec. 7(1) of the Constitution states that “this Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa

  • The article seeks to determine whether a balancing of these rights can be achieved within the Philippi Horticultural Area (PHA), and whether portions of the PHA can be developed in a manner that protects and enhances the cultural and environmental integrity of the area, while allowing urban development to accommodate new and existing communities

  • This article uses Cape Town’s Philippi Horticultural Area (PHA) as a case study to demonstrate how rights can potentially be spatially and legally balanced when they clash. It should be noted at the outset that the authors are not legal experts, but professional planners practising in the realm of spatial planning8 and land development

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

The Philippi Horticultural Area (PHA) is often referred to as Cape Town’s ‘food basket’, providing over one-third of Cape Town’s fresh vegetable produce. The article seeks to determine whether a balancing of these rights can be achieved within the PHA, and whether portions of the PHA can be developed in a manner that protects and enhances the cultural and environmental integrity of the area, while allowing urban development to accommodate new and existing communities. A symbiotic relationship must be cultivated between urban and agricultural land uses, through appropriate urban development articulated in a spatial framework that provides clarity as to how urban development can assist in protecting productive agricultural activity. In this way, the role of the PHA as Cape Town’s ‘food basket’ can be better conserved for current and future generations

INTRODUCTION
GENERAL FRAMING OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Example One
Example Two
Example Three
Example Four
OVERVIEW OF THE PHILIPPI HORTICULTURAL AREA
Key development applications
Objections to development applications
BALANCING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE PHILIPPI HORTICULTURAL AREA
Limitation of rights
Proportionality
Transformation
Democratic constitutionalism
A STRATEGIC WAY FORWARD
Findings
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.