Abstract
Conversations on local governmental efficiency typically suggest that fragmentation—having “too many” local units—is the primary deterrent to efficient and effective regional governance, and that consolidation is the best solution. This analysis examines these implicit assumptions using evidence from the current literature and a comparative case analysis. It explores alternatives for unification by looking at city–county consolidation attempts in midsize jurisdictions with an urban–rural mix. It also presents a checklist tool to assist practitioners in considering important underlying factors in their jurisdictions. Finally, it applies an interpretive guide to the checklist to help select among the contingent paths toward jurisdictional unification.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
