Abstract

This article provides a reading of the Gītā in terms of a dimension of moral thinking that can be understood to cut across the more familiar consequentialist and deontological positions typically invoked when attempting to interpret the text's ethical significance—namely that developed by Stanley Cavell, which he calls "Emersonian Moral Perfectionism."

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call