A Challenge to Chemical Intuition: Donor–Acceptor Interactions in H3BL and H2B+L (L=CO; EC5H5, E=N–Bi)

Abstract

The equilibrium geometries and bond energies of the complexes H(3)B-L and H(2)B(+)-L (L=CO; EC(5)H(5): E=N, P, As, Sb, Bi) have been calculated at the BP86/TZ2P level of theory. The nature of the donor-acceptor bonds was investigated by energy decomposition analysis (EDA). The bond strengths of H(3)B-L have the order CO>N>P>As>Sb>Bi. The calculated values are between D(e)=37.1 kcal mol(-1) for H(3)B-CO and D(e)=6.9 kcal mol(-1) for H(3)B-BiC(5)H(5). The bond dissociation energies of the cations H(2)B(+)-CO and H(2)B(+)-EC(5)H(5) are larger than for H(3)B--L, particularly for complexes of the heterobenzene ligands. The calculated values are between D(e)=51.9 kcal mol(-1) for H(2)B(+)-CO and D(e)=122.1 kcal mol(-1) for H(2)B(+)-NC(5)H(5). The trend of the BDE of H(2)B(+)-CO and H(2)B(+)-EC(5)H(5) is N>P>As>Sb>Bi>CO. A surprising result is found for H(2)B(+)-CO, which has a significantly stronger and yet substantially longer bond than H(3)B-CO. The reason for the longer but stronger bond in H(2)B(+)-CO compared with that in H(3)B-CO comes mainly from the change in electrostatic attraction and pi bonding at shorter distances, which increases more in the neutral system than in the cation, and to a lesser extent from the deformation energy of the fragments. The H(2)B(+)<--NC(5)H(5) pi( perpendicular) donation plays an important role for the stronger interactions at shorter distances compared with those in H(3)B-NC(5)H(5). The attractive interaction in H(2)B(+)--CO further increases at bond lengths that are shorter than the equilibrium value, but this is compensated by the energy which is necessary to deform BH(2) (+) from its linear equilibrium geometry to the bent form in the complex. The EDA shows that the contributions of the orbital interactions to the donor-acceptor bonds are always larger than the classical electrostatic contributions, but the latter term plays an important role for the trend in bond strength. The largest contributions to the orbital interactions come from the sigma orbitals. The EDA calculations suggest that heterobenzene ligands may become moderately strong pi donors in complexes with strong Lewis acids, while CO is only a weak pi donor. The much stronger interaction energies in H(2)B(+)-EC(5)H(5) compared with those in H(3)B-EC(5)H(5) are caused by the significantly larger contribution of the pi(perpendicular) orbitals in H(2)B(+)-EC(5)H(5) and by the increase of the binding interactions of the sigma+pi( parallel) orbitals.