Abstract

1990. We find that the impacts of defense spending on economic growth were different in each country during the last century. Further, we find that impacts within each country change dramatically over time. These results suggest that the defense-growth tradeoff is neither universal nor constant. The findings further cast doubt on the notion that the costs of providing public goods is the primary factor in explaining the rise and fall of hegemonic predominance. The results also suggest thatJapan can take advantage of spinoffs from government and military spending and further that higher military expenditures are unlikely to be deleterious to Japan's economic performance. In the U.S. case, the results suggest reduced military spending will help the economy. A greater burden sharing between the U.S. and Japan may be mutually beneficial.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.