Abstract

Thoravision, the first commercially available digital radiography system utilising amorphous selenium, has been evaluated from both clinical and physical perspectives. The advent of digital radiography systems has made the optimisation of both image quality and dose an important problem. Initial studies, using the manufacturer's recommended factors, demonstrated that the image quality, measured both objectively and subjectively, was significantly superior to conventional screen-film images. However, some questions still remained regarding the system's performance. A second study using alternative factors showed that the Thoravision always produced acceptable diagnostic images, regardless of the factors, and there are advantages to using lower kVp, objective measurements of image quality confirm this. It is clear that no single set of radiographic factors and image processing algorithms will produce optimised images for every patient and further elucidation of the problem is required. The difference between acceptable and a good clinical image is also highlighted and the implications discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.