Abstract

The low informative value of the allergy testing to titanium makes it difficult to diagnose allergy to this component. The present paper describes a case report of an allergy to a titanium-coated pacemaker implanted into a 14-year-old patient. This is the first time eosinophil cationic protein and tryptase to be detected at the inflammation site while making diagnosis of allergy to titanium-coated pacemaker. The reimplantation of a gold-coated pacemaker prevents recurrence of inflammatory changes in the area of pacemaker insertion and infectious complications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call