Abstract
This article presents the case of a highly hypnotizable 28-year-old man who gave a false confession under police interrogation following an unintended hypnotic induction, but who was exonerated years later on the basis of DNA evidence. The author proposes that assessment of possible high hypnotizability be conducted in instances of otherwise unsubstantiated confessions.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
