Abstract
This paper provides a description of the Accusative case in Tundra Yukaghir. Contrary to the previous analyses, I argue that Tundra Yukaghir has a syntactic Accusative case that is realised by two dedicated morphological forms, the distribution of which depends on a complex network of lexical specifications, the semantics of the NP and its structural properties. The description of the Accusative serves as a background for the discussion of two difficult questions of case theory. First, I show that Differential Argument Marking in Tundra Yukaghir cannot be reduced to one or more overarching syntactic or semantic features, as is commonly done in the literature, but is rather triggered by an idiosyncratic mixture of factors and is thus rather a matter of listing than of syntactic derivation. Second, I apply the method of mapping morphological properties of case on syntactic features and use recurring patterns to identify those features that are relevant for the definition of a syntactic case in Tundra Yukaghir. The method can be applied in various languages to help solve the difficult issue of identifying case.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.