Abstract

A cancer spheroid array chip was developed by modifying a micropillar and microwell structure to improve the evaluation of drugs targeting specific mutations such as phosphor-epidermal growth factor receptor (p-EGFR). The chip encapsulated cells in alginate and allowed cancer cells to grow for over seven days to form cancer spheroids. However, reagents or media used to screen drugs in a high-density spheroid array had to be replaced very carefully, and this was a tedious task. Particularly, the immunostaining of cancer spheroids required numerous steps to replace many of the reagents used for drug evaluation. To solve this problem, we adapted a micropillar and microwell structure to a spheroid array. Thus, culturing cancer spheroids in alginate spots attached to the micropillar allowed us to replace the reagents in the microwell chip with a single fill of fresh medium, without damaging the cancer spheroids. In this study, a cancer spheroid array was made from a p-EGFR-overexpressing cell line (A549 lung cancer cell line). In a 12 by 36 column array chip (25 mm by 75 mm), the spheroid over 100 µm in diameter started to form at day seven and p-EGFR was also considerably overexpressed. The array was used for p-EGFR inhibition and cell viability measurement against seventy drugs, including ten EGFR-targeting drugs. By comparing drug response in the spheroid array (spheroid model) with that in the single-cell model, we demonstrated that the two models showed different responses and that the spheroid model might be more resistant to some drugs, thus narrowing the choice of drug candidates.

Highlights

  • When using conventional approaches for evaluating anticancer drugs, the 2-dimensional monolayer (2D) cell culture model is the gold standard

  • It has been reported that animal cells grown in biocompatible 3D cell culture models exhibit different gene expression patterns than when they are grown in 2D cell culture models [1]

  • When animal cells are used for analyzing drug efficacy or toxicity, the drug reactivity in a 3D cell culture model differs greatly from what has been observed in conventional 2D cell culture models [3–6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When using conventional approaches for evaluating anticancer drugs, the 2-dimensional monolayer (2D) cell culture model is the gold standard. When cancer cells are cultured in plastic dishes, the cell morphology differs from the 3D growth occurring in animal cells in the living body When cells derived from cancer patients are cultured in 3D, cell-cell interactions and the extracellular matrix (ECM) change the morphology of the cells in the culture, as well as the type and expression level of the major genes being expressed [3–6]. For these reasons, tools aiding in the development of 3D cell cultures are being studied, and some have even

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call