Abstract

In 2008, Guatemala passed the Law against Femicide and Other Forms of Violence against Women, establishing the gender-based killing of women (femicide) as a unique crime. Since then, over 9000 Guatemalan women and girls have died violent deaths. How do Guatemalan institutions and publics react to these women’s murders, and what do these reactions reveal about the impacts of legislative reform for individual victims, Guatemalan society, and criminal justice institutions? To answer these questions, we analyze state, media, and public reactions to three high-profile femicides that took place after the 2008 VAW Law. We trace the criminal justice response and legal developments following each femicide, and couple this with an analysis of newspaper coverage and social media commentary about the case. We find that despite the passage of new legislation and the creation of new institutions, various weaknesses in the Guatemalan criminal justice system undermine the impacts of reforms. These weaknesses in the criminal justice system produce three types of injuries: (1) individual injuries by hurting victims and their families; (2) public injuries by diverting public attention away from reflections about social norms and VAWG; and (3) institutional injuries by reinforcing the public’s distrust of the criminal justice system.

Highlights

  • In 2008, Guatemala passed the Law against Femicide and Other Forms of Violence against Women (2008 VAW Law), becoming one of the first countries to establish femicide, or the gender-based killing of a woman, as a unique crime with a high mandatory minimum sentence

  • How do Guatemalan institutions and publics react to these murders, and what do these reactions reveal about the degree to which the law’s potential is being realized? To answer these questions, we analyze state, media, and public reactions to three high-profile femicides occurring after the 2008 VAW Law

  • We find that the criminalization of violence against women and girls (VAWG) in Guatemala is embedded in a socio-legal context characterized by significant anti-VAWG activism, and a weak criminal justice system and contradictory trends in media representation of VAWG

Read more

Summary

A Body Speaks

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Introduction
Data and Methods for Investigating the Effects VAWG Reforms
Discussion
Findings
High-Profile Femicides and Trust in Institutions
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call