Abstract

Infant pain has both immediate and long-term negative consequences, yet in clinical practice it is often undertreated. To date, few pain-relieving drugs have been tested in infants. Morphine is a potent analgesic that provides effective pain relief in adults, but there is inconclusive evidence for its effectiveness in infants. The purpose of this study is to establish whether oral morphine provides effective analgesia for procedural pain in infants. A blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized, phase II, clinical trial will be undertaken to determine whether morphine sulphate administered orally prior to clinically-required retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and heel lancing provides effective analgesia. 156 infants between 34 and 42 weeks’ gestational age who require a clinical heel lance and ROP screening on the same test occasion will be included in the trial. Infants will be randomised to receive either a single dose of morphine sulphate (100 μg/kg) or placebo. Each infant will be monitored for 48 hours and safety data will be collected during the 24 hours following drug administration. The primary outcome will be the Premature Infant Pain Profile–revised (PIPP-R) score 30 seconds after ROP screening. The co-primary outcome will be the magnitude of nociceptive-specific brain activity evoked by a clinically-required heel lance. Infant clinical stability will be assessed by comparing the number of episodes of bradycardia, tachycardia, desaturation and apnoea, and changes in respiratory support requirements in the 24-hour periods before and after the clinical intervention. In addition, drug safety will be assessed by considering the occurrence of apnoeic and hypotensive episodes requiring intervention in the 24-hour period following drug administration. This study has been published as an Accepted Protocol Summary by The Lancet.

Highlights

  • Background and rationale Context TheProtocol for our clinical trial titled ‘A blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy of morphine analgesia for procedural pain in infants’ is presented here.A brief summary of the Trial Protocol has already been published by The Lancet as an Accepted Protocol Summary[1]

  • While the results of this study suggested that morphine may provide effective pain relief, the trial was stopped prematurely due to changes to research regulations of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) and the need to obtain new approval to continue the study

  • While the primary objective of this study is to look at the effect of morphine analgesia on well-validated clinical pain scores calculated 30 seconds after retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening, this study provides an opportunity to gain a mechanistic insight into how morphine alters nociceptive brain and spinal cord activity evoked by an acute noxious heel lance

Read more

Summary

Background

Pain in infancy is a serious clinical issue. While infant pain is recognised to have both immediate and long-term consequences, it is still drastically under-treated in this population. It is plausible that administration of morphine prior to ROP screening may provide effective pain relief and reduce the resultant physiological instability caused by the procedure. It is feasible to test whether morphine effectively reduces clinical pain scores during ROP screening and to establish whether morphine reduces nociceptive brain and spinal cord activity evoked by a noxious heel lance. While the primary objective of this study is to look at the effect of morphine analgesia on well-validated clinical pain scores calculated 30 seconds after ROP screening, this study provides an opportunity to gain a mechanistic insight into how morphine alters nociceptive brain and spinal cord activity evoked by an acute noxious heel lance. To provide a better mechanistic understanding of how morphine affects nociceptive brain and spinal cord activity we will investigate the effect of morphine on electrophysiological measures of

Objectives
Recording Methods
The Editors of The Lancet: Protocol review at The Lancet
Green B
11. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Findings
Background and rationale
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call