Abstract

In this work, we show that valve-based bioprinting induces no measurable detrimental effects on human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). The aim of the current study was three-fold: first, to assess the response of hiPSC-CMs to several hydrogel formulations by measuring electrophysiological function; second, to customise a new microvalve-based cell printing mechanism in order to deliver hiPSC-CMs suspensions, and third, to compare the traditional manual pipetting cell-culture method and cardiomyocytes dispensed with the bioprinter. To achieve the first and third objectives, iCell2 (Cellular Dynamics International) hiPSC-CMs were used. The effects of well-known drugs were tested on iCell2 cultured by manual pipetting and bioprinting. Despite the results showing that hydrogels and their cross-linkers significantly reduced the electrophysiological performance of the cells compared with those cultured on fibronectin, the bio-ink droplets containing a liquid suspension of live cardiomyocytes proved to be an alternative to standard manual handling and could reduce the number of cells required for drug testing, with no significant differences in drug-sensitivity between both approaches. These results provide a basis for the development of a novel bioprinter with nanolitre resolution to decrease the required number of cells and to automate the cell plating process.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe pharmaceutical industry faces many challenges in the development of new drugs

  • We previously demonstrated that the delivery process was capable of printing human pluripotent stem cells without affecting their key biological functions, including pluripotency and post-printing differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells with albumin secretion and morphology similar to hepatocytes [38]

  • There was no statistically significant difference between cardiomyocytes dispensed with the bioprinter theisstandard or in their

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry faces many challenges in the development of new drugs. It can take decades to successfully develop a novel drug and only a very small number of drug candidates are approved for human use since most drug candidates (90%) fail in the last stage (clinical trials), mainly due to safety issues [1,2,3,4]. The most common causes of drug candidates’ failure and drug attrition are unexpected toxicity issues, hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity: 45% of the total post-approval drug withdrawals are due to cardiovascular liabilities, and 32% of the failures are due to hepatotoxicity [5].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call