Abstract
Covid-19 pandemic has impacted all forms of global research since March 2020. More than 1.5 lakh scholarly publications relevant to all areas of COVID-19 in different formats are published all over the world. Researchers are still looking for a complete cure for this condition; while a few vaccines are currently available, research on this front is still ongoing. This research aims to perform a bibliometric assessment of 63 bibliometric studies on Covid-19 research publications, derived from Scopus database. Bibliometric R (biblioshiny) and MS-Excel were used to perform data analysis. The 63 selected bibliometric studies are spread across 42 different sources (journals) and involve 231 authors. Seven authors have solely authored and the rest 224 have collaboratively worked on 63 articles. The study showed that collaborative work outnumbers single-authored work by a factor of the collaborative index of four. The most relevant source is Library Philosophy and Practice; the most cited source is Scientometrics. The most cited and most productive author is Y. Wang, from the University of Idaho Library.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
