A benchmark assessment of residues: comparison of Athabasca bitumen with conventional and heavy crudes

Abstract

Compared to benchmark crude oils, bitumen does not respond well to conventional upgrading processes. In order to improve our understanding of this problem, we compare the chemical and physical properties of fractions from super critical fluid extraction of bitumen pitch with the corresponding fractions of residua from Venezuelan heavy oil, a Saudi Arabian light crude and a Chinese Daqing conventional crude.Relatively minor differences in chemical structure were observed between the corresponding residua fractions from Athabasca bitumen, Venezuelan heavy oil and Saudi Arabian light crude. Only the Chinese Daqing showed significant variance; this sample is much more aliphatic and has greater geometrical dimensions than the corresponding samples from the other residua.The end-cut from Athabasca bitumen pitch contained ultra-fine solids together with much higher levels of nickel, vanadium and nitrogen than the conventional crude end-cuts. These components are among the most intractable in upgrading and could be responsible for the problems encountered in bitumen upgrading, especially by catalytic processes.