Abstract

SummaryPopulation-level disease risk across a set of non-overlapping areal units varies in space and time, and a large research literature has developed methodology for identifying clusters of areal units exhibiting elevated risks. However, almost no research has extended the clustering paradigm to identify groups of areal units exhibiting similar temporal disease trends. We present a novel Bayesian hierarchical mixture model for achieving this goal, with inference based on a Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo ((MC)n}{}^3) algorithm. The effectiveness of the (MC)n}{}^3 algorithm compared to a standard Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation is demonstrated in a simulation study, and the methodology is motivated by two important case studies in the United Kingdom. The first concerns the impact on measles susceptibility of the discredited paper linking the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination to an increased risk of Autism and investigates whether all areas in the Scotland were equally affected. The second concerns respiratory hospitalizations and investigates over a 10 year period which parts of Glasgow have shown increased, decreased, and no change in risk.

Highlights

  • This supplementary material has the following sections

  • Scotland has a population of 5.4 million people, and for this study has been partitioned into K = 1235 non-overlapping intermediate zones (IZ), which are a key geography designed by the Scottish Government for distributing small-area statistics

  • The constant c is updated during the algorithm to ensure the spacing between the temperatures of the chains provides an acceptance rate of 20-30%, such that, if the acceptance rate is greater than 30%, the difference between the temperatures will widen, and shrink if the acceptance rate of swapping chains is less than 20%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This supplementary material has the following sections. Appendix A presents additional data description for the two case studies, while Appendix B describes the (MC)[3] estimation algorithm used to fit the model. Appendix C summarises the computational demand of fitting our model to data of different sizes, while Appendix D presents the data generation and additional results from the simulation study. Appendix E presents additional sensitivity analyses for the two case studies

Measles susceptibility case study
Findings
Respiratory hospitalisation case study

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.