Abstract

Methods used to detect differentially expressed genes in situations with one control and one treatment are t-tests. These methods do not per- form well when control and treatment variances are different. In situations with a control and more than one treatment, it is common to apply analysis of variance followed by a Tukey and/or Duncan test to identify which treat- ment caused the difference. We propose a Bayesian approach for multiple comparison analysis which is very useful in the context of DNA microarray experiments. It uses a priori Dirichlet process and Polya urn scheme. It is a unified procedure (for cases with one or more treatments) which detects differentially expressed genes and identify treatments causing the difference. We use simulations to verify the performance of the proposed method and compare it with usual methods. In cases with control and one treatment and control and more than one treatment followed by Tukey and Duncan tests, the method presents better performance when variances are different. The method is applied to two real data sets. In these cases, genes not detected by usual methods are identified by the proposed method.

Highlights

  • A common interest in gene expression data analysis is to identify genes with different expression levels

  • Results from simulations showed a better performance for PU than TT, CT and Bayesian t-test (BTT), for experiments with control and one treatment

  • This was clearer in situations with different variances

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A common interest in gene expression data analysis is to identify genes with different expression levels. One of the first proposed approaches was the fold-change (Schena et al, 1995; Allison et al, 2006), where a gene is considered differentially expressed if the average of the logarithm of the observed expression levels in treatment and control differ by more than a cutoff value, Rc, which is previously prefixed. Another method used for gene expression data analysis is the two-sample t- test (T T ), see Baldi and Long (2001) and Hatfield et al (2003).

Bayesian Model
A priori Dirichlet process via latent variables
Multiple comparison
Control and two treatment
Data Analysis
Simulated data sets
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call