A Bayesian inference framework for fault slip distributions based on ensemble modelling of the uncertainty of underground structure: with a focus on uncertain fault dip

Abstract

SUMMARYThe model prediction errors that originate from the uncertainty of underground structure are often a major contributor of the errors between the data and the model predictions in fault slip estimation using geodetic or seismic waveform data. However, most studies on slip inversions either neglect the model prediction errors or do not distinguish them from observation errors. Several methods that explicitly incorporated the model prediction errors in slip estimation, which has been proposed in the past decade, commonly assumed a Gaussian distribution for the stochastic property of the model prediction errors to simplify the formulation. Moreover, the information on both the slip distribution and the underground structure is expected to be successfully extracted from the data by incorporating the stochastic property of the model prediction errors. In this study, we propose a novel flexible Bayesian inference framework for estimating fault slips that can accurately incorporate non-Gaussian model prediction errors. This method considers the uncertainty of the underground structure, including fault geometry, based on the ensemble modelling of the uncertainty of Green’s functions. Furthermore, the framework allows the estimation of the posterior probability density function (PDF) of the parameters of the underground structure by calculating the likelihood of each sample in the ensemble. We performed numerical experiments for estimating the slip deficit rate (SDR) distribution on a 2-D thrust fault using synthetic data of surface displacement rates, which is the simplest problem setting that can essentially demonstrate the fundamental idea and validate the advantage of the proposed method. In the experiments, the dip angle of the fault plane was the parameter used to characterize the underground structure. The proposed method succeeded in estimating a posterior PDF of SDR that is consistent with the true one, despite the uncertain and inaccurate information of the dip angle. In addition, the method could estimate a posterior PDF of the dip angle that has a strong peak near the true angle. In contrast, the estimation results obtained using a conventional approach, which introduces regularization based on smoothing constraints and does not explicitly distinguish the prediction and observation errors, included a significant amount of bias, which was not noted in the results obtained using the proposed method. The estimation results obtained using different settings of the parameters suggested that inaccurate prior information of the underground structure with a small variance possibly results in significant bias in the estimated PDFs, particularly the posterior PDFs for SDR, those for the underground structure, and the posterior predicted PDF of the displacement rates. The distribution shapes of the model prediction errors for the representative model parameters in certain observation points are significantly asymmetric with large absolute values of the sample skewness, suggesting that they would not be well-modelled by Gaussian approximations.